🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.